A Guide to Specifying Effects in Latent Change Score Models with Moderated Mediation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35566/jbds/orourkeKeywords:
Latent Change, Mediation, Moderation, Moderated Mediation, Conditional Indirect EffectsAbstract
Latent change score (LCS) models are discrete-time longitudinal models that concurrently investigate growth over time and dynamic (lagged) relations among variables. Bivariate LCS models can be extended to multivariate scenarios with mediators and moderators, and mediation paths can be constrained or freely estimated across time. We provide a decision-making guide for model specification based on variable scale of measurement and hypothesized change processes. We then simulate two examples to illustrate how LCS models can be specified to estimate moderated mediation effects where the indirect effect from mediation is conditional upon values of the time-invariant moderator. We provide simulated data and annotated Mplus and R lavaan code.
References
Altman, D. G., & Royston, P. (2006). The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ, 332(7549), 1080.1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1080
Alwin, D. F., & Hauser, R. M. (1975). The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American Sociological Review, 40(1), 37. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094445
Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Buil, J. M., Van Lier, P. A. C., Brendgen, M. R., Koot, H. M., & Vitaro, F. (2017). Developmental pathways linking childhood temperament with antisocial behavior and substance use in adolescence: Explanatory mechanisms in the peer environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(6), 948–966. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000132
Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2021). Testing moderation in business and psychological studies with latent moderated structural equations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(6), 1009–1033. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09717-0
Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure “change”: Or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74(1), 68–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029382
Cáncer, P. F., & Estrada, E. (2023). Effectiveness of the deterministic and stochastic bivariate latent change score models for longitudinal research. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 30(4), 618–632. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2161906
Cáncer, P. F., Estrada, E., & Ferrer, E. (2023). A dynamic approach to control for cohort differences in maturation speed using accelerated longitudinal designs. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 30, 761–777. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2163647
Cáncer, P. F., Estrada, E., Ollero, M. J. F., & Ferrer, E. (2021). Dynamical properties and conceptual interpretation of latent change score models. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 696419. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.696419
Estrada, E., Bunge, S. A., & Ferrer, E. (2023). Controlling for cohort effects in accelerated longitudinal designs using continuous- and discrete-time dynamic models. Psychological Methods, 28(2), 359–378. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000427
Goldsmith, K. A., MacKinnon, D. P., Chalder, T., White, P. D., Sharpe, M., & Pickles, A. (2018). Tutorial: The practical application of longitudinal structural equation mediation models in clinical trials. Psychological Methods, 23(2), 191–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000154
Gonzalez, O., & Valente, M. J. (2023). Accommodating a latent XM interaction in statistical mediation analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 58(4), 659–674. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2022.2119928
Gradinger, P., Yanagida, T., Strohmeier, D., & Spiel, C. (2015). Prevention of cyberbullying and cyber victimization: Evaluation of the ViSC social competence program. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 87–110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.963231
Griffiths, S., Kievit, R. A., & Norbury, C. (2022). Mutualistic coupling of vocabulary and non-verbal reasoning in children with and without language disorder. Developmental Science, 25(3), e13208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13208
Grimm, K. J. (2007). Multivariate longitudinal methods for studying developmental relationships between depression and academic achievement. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 328–339. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407077754
Grimm, K. J., An, Y., McArdle, J. J., Zonderman, A. B., & Resnick, S. M. (2012). Recent changes leading to subsequent changes: Extensions of multivariate latent difference score models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(2), 268–292. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.659627
Hamagami, F., & McArdle, J. J. (2001). Advanced studies of individual differences linear dynamic models for longitudinal data analysis. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling (pp. 223–266). Psychology Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601858-13
Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). New York ; London: The Guilford Press.
Hilley, C. D., & O’Rourke, H. P. (2022). Dynamic change meets mechanisms of change: Examining mediators in the latent change score framework. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(2), 125–141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254211064352
Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of panel data (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5(5), 602–619. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8100500502
Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36(4), 409–426. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291366
Könen, T., & Karbach, J. (2021). Individual differences in intervention-related changes. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 251524592097917. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920979172
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Routledge.
MacKinnon, D. P., Fritz, M. S., Williams, J., & Lockwood, C. M. (2007). Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: Program PRODCLIN. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 384–389. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193007
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
MacKinnon, D. P., & Pirlott, A. G. (2015). Statistical approaches for enhancing causal interpretation of the M to Y relation in mediation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(1), 30–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314542878
MacKinnon, D. P., Valente, M. J., & Gonzalez, O. (2020). The correspondence between causal and traditional mediation analysis: the link is the mediator by treatment interaction. Prevention Science, 21(2), 147–157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01076-4
McArdle, J. J. (2001). A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic structural analysis. In Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future. A Festschrift in Honor of Karl Joreskog (pp. 341–380). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
McArdle, J. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 577–605. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612
McArdle, J. J., & Grimm, K. J. (2010). Five steps in latent curve and latent change score modeling with longitudinal data. In K. Van Montfort, J. H. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal Research with Latent Variables (pp. 245–273). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11760-2_8
McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (1996). Multilevel models from a multiple group structural equation perspective. In Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 89–124). Psychology Press.
McArdle, J. J., & Prindle, J. J. (2008). A latent change score analysis of a randomized clinical trial in reasoning training. Psychology and Aging, 23(4), 702–719. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014349
Miočević, M., O’Rourke, H. P., MacKinnon, D. P., & Brown, H. C. (2018). Statistical properties of four effect-size measures for mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 285–301. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0870-1
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
O’Rourke, H. P., Fine, K. L., Grimm, K. J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2022). The importance of time metric precision when implementing bivariate latent change score models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 57(4), 561–580. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2021.1874261
O’Rourke, H. P., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2015). When the test of mediation is more powerful than the test of the total effect. Behavior Research Methods, 47(2), 424–442. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0481-z
O’Rourke, H. P., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2018). Reasons for testing mediation in the absence of an intervention effect: A research imperative in prevention and intervention research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 79(2), 171–181. doi: https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2018.79.171
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Raykov, T. (1999). Are simple change scores obsolete? an approach to studying correlates and predictors of change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23(2), 120–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/01466219922031248
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan : An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Sardeshmukh, S. R., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2017). Integrating moderation and mediation: A structural equation modeling approach. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 721–745. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115621609
Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Mediation models for longitudinal data in developmental research. Research in Human Development, 6(2-3), 144–164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600902911247
Serang, S., Grimm, K. J., & Zhang, Z. (2019). On the correspondence between the latent growth curve and latent change score models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(4), 623–635. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1533835
Simone, M., & Lockhart, G. (2019). Empirical sample size guidelines for use of latent difference score mediation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(4), 636–645. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1540934
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/270723
Usami, S., Hayes, T., & McArdle, J. J. (2016). Inferring longitudinal relationships between variables: Model selection between the latent change score and autoregressive cross-lagged factor models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(3), 331–342. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2015.1066680
Valeri, L., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2013). Mediation analysis allowing for exposure–mediator interactions and causal interpretation: Theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psychological Methods, 18(2), 137–150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031034
Wald, A. (1943). Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 54(3), 426–482. doi: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1943-0012401-3
Zaccoletti, S., Camacho, A., Correia, N., Aguiar, C., Mason, L., Alves, R. A., & Daniel, J. R. (2020). Parents’ perceptions of student academic motivation during the COVID-19 lockdown: A cross-country comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 592670. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592670
Zhu, S., Sagherian, K., Wang, Y., Nahm, E.-S., & Friedmann, E. (2021). Longitudinal moderated mediation analysis in parallel process latent growth curve modeling in intervention studies. Nursing Research, 70(3), 184–192. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000503
